Corpfin, Mod 3: Present Value of Growth Opportunities


Corpfin, Mod 3: Present Value of Growth Opportunities

Author
Message
NEAS
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Posts: 4.3K, Visits: 1.3K


Corporate Finance, Module 3: “The Value of Common Stocks” (Chapter 4)

Intuition: Present Value of Growth Opportunities

(The attached PDF file has better formatting.)

Question: The dividend growth rate is the return on equity times the plow-back ratio. Is the return on equity in the dividend growth model the return on market equity or the return on book equity?

Answer: Let’s examine what happens if we use the return on market equity. Suppose a stock stands now at $300 and has a 10% dividend yield, defined as next year’s dividend divided by the current price: DIV1 / P0. Earnings next year will be $50.

A.    What is next year’s dividend?
B.    What is the payout ratio?
C.    What is the plow-back ratio?
D.    What is the return on equity?
E.    What is the dividend growth rate?
F.    What is the capitalization rate for this stock?
G.    What is the present value of growth opportunities?

Question: This is not difficult; we solve the problem as follows.

Part A: Next year’s dividend is $300 × 10% = $30.

Part B: The payout ratio is $30 / $50 = 60%.

Part C: The plow-back ratio is 1 – 60% = 40%.

Part D: The return on equity is $50 / $300 = 1/6 ≈ 16.67%. (This is Jacob’s error; by using the market value of equity instead of the book value of equity, the result is meaningless.)

Part E: The dividend growth rate is 16.67% × 40% = 6.67%.

Part F: $300 = $30 / (k – 6.67%) ➾ k = 16.67%.

Part G: If the all earnings were paid out as dividends, the stock price would be $50 / 16.67% = $300.00. The present value of growth opportunities is zero.


Answer: Suppose we change the problem to:

“A stock stands now at $200 and has a 10% dividend yield, defined as next year’s dividend divided by the current price: DIV1 / P0. Earnings next year will be $50.”

A.    What is next year’s dividend?
B.    What is the payout ratio?
C.    What is the plow-back ratio?
D.    What is the return on equity?
E.    What is the dividend growth rate?
F.    What is the capitalization rate for this stock?
G.    What is the present value of growth opportunities?

Question: The only difference is the stock price; we solve the problem as follows:

Part A: Next year’s dividend is $200 × 10% = $20.

Part B: The payout ratio is $20 / $50 = 40%.

Part C: The plow-back ratio is 1 – 40% = 60%.

Part D: The return on equity is $50 / $200 = ¼ = 25%.

Part E: The dividend growth rate is 25% × 60% = 15%.

Part F: $200 = $20 / (k – 15%) ➾ k = 25%.

Part G: If the all earnings were paid out as dividends, the stock price would be $50 / 25% = $200.00. The present value of growth opportunities is zero.

Question: This seems strange; we changed the stock price but there is no change to the present value of growth opportunities.

Answer: The return on market equity is the capitalization rate for the stock. If we use the return on market equity instead of the return on book equity, the capitalization rate just equals the return on equity and the present value of growth opportunities is zero. That’s not the intention. Rather, the return on equity is the return on book equity, and the difference between the market value of equity and the book value of equity reflects the present value of growth opportunities.

Question: What is the mistake in Part D? Isn’t the return on an asset equal to the income divided by the initial price?

Answer: The formula means return on book equity, not return on market equity. The return on market equity is the market capitalization rate.

Question: Does return on equity normally mean return on book equity or return on market equity?

Answer: The meaning depends on the context. Brealey and Myers try to state explicitly which they mean.

Question: What is book equity and what is market value (market equity)?

Answer: Book equity is the assets on the balance sheet minus the liabilities on the balance sheet. It is an accounting item. It does not change by movements in the stock price of the firm’s shares.

Market value is the number of share times the stock price. If investors think the firm is doing better, they may bid up the stock price. The market value increases, but the book equity does not change.

The difference between market value and book equity is the present value of future growth opportunities.

Attachments
Edited 6 Years Ago by NEAS
NEAS
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Posts: 4.3K, Visits: 1.3K

Jacob: What is the mistake in Part D? Isn’t the return on an asset equal to the income divided by the initial price?

Rachel: The formula means return on book equity, not return on market equity. The return on market equity is the market capitalization rate.

Jacob: Does return on equity normally mean return on book equity or return on market equity?

Rachel: The meaning depends on the context. Brealey and Myers try to state explicitly which they mean.


byd
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2, Visits: 1

could you specify for the problem above

1. Could you define the meaning of the word "equity" for me as in "return on equity" and "book equity" ?   Do they mean  "common stock" or "net value" ??

2. Do you mean the "$50/$300" and "$50/$200" used by Jacob are return on book equity , and the return on market equity is capitalization rate ?

 

thanks


byd
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2, Visits: 1

can someone help me out here

thnx


Ron
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5, Visits: 1
For part D, the problem deliberately does not provide enough information to determine book equity.

I believe the whole point is to demonstrate that if we use market equity instead of book equity, then we will always compute zero growth opportunities. This is Jacob's error.

In addition to the given information, if we were given any one of (Book Equity per share) or (Cap Rate) or (Dividend Growth Rate) or (PVGO) then we could compute the other three quantities.

Example:
Suppose a stock is currently $300 per share with a 10% dividend yield, and suppose next year's earnings will be $50. In addition, suppose the book equity is $2.5 billion with 10 million shares outstanding.

Next year's dividend is 10% of $300 = $30.
The payout ratio is $30/$50 = 60%, so the plowback ratio is 40%.
The book equity per share is $2.5 billion / 10 million = $250.
The ROE is $50 / $250 = 20%, using book equity and not market equity.
The dividend growth rate is 20% of 40% = 8%.
The cap rate is $30/$300 + 8% = 18%.
If all earnings were paid out as dividends, then the stock price would be $50/18% = $277.78, so the PVGO is $300 - $277.78 = $22.22.

Alternatively, suppose book equity is $5 billion with 10 million shares outstanding.
In this case:
The book equity per share is $5 billion / 10 million = $500. This exceeds the stock price!
The ROE is $50 / $500 = 10%, using book equity and not market equity.
The dividend growth rate is 10% of 40% = 4%.
The cap rate is $30/$300 + 4% = 14%.
If all earnings were paid out as dividends, then the stock price would be $50/14% = $357.14, so the PVGO is $300 - $357.14 = $-57.14 which is negative because the market price is less than the book equity.

NEAS
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Posts: 4.3K, Visits: 1.3K
Ron - 9/6/2010 7:05:55 PM
For part D, the problem deliberately does not provide enough information to determine book equity.

I believe the whole point is to demonstrate that if we use market equity instead of book equity, then we will always compute zero growth opportunities. This is Jacob's error.

In addition to the given information, if we were given any one of (Book Equity per share) or (Cap Rate) or (Dividend Growth Rate) or (PVGO) then we could compute the other three quantities.

Example:
Suppose a stock is currently $300 per share with a 10% dividend yield, and suppose next year's earnings will be $50. In addition, suppose the book equity is $2.5 billion with 10 million shares outstanding.

Next year's dividend is 10% of $300 = $30.
The payout ratio is $30/$50 = 60%, so the plowback ratio is 40%.
The book equity per share is $2.5 billion / 10 million = $250.
The ROE is $50 / $250 = 20%, using book equity and not market equity.
The dividend growth rate is 20% of 40% = 8%.
The cap rate is $30/$300 + 8% = 18%.
If all earnings were paid out as dividends, then the stock price would be $50/18% = $277.78, so the PVGO is $300 - $277.78 = $22.22.

Alternatively, suppose book equity is $5 billion with 10 million shares outstanding.
In this case:
The book equity per share is $5 billion / 10 million = $500. This exceeds the stock price!
The ROE is $50 / $500 = 10%, using book equity and not market equity.
The dividend growth rate is 10% of 40% = 4%.
The cap rate is $30/$300 + 4% = 14%.
If all earnings were paid out as dividends, then the stock price would be $50/14% = $357.14, so the PVGO is $300 - $357.14 = $-57.14 which is negative because the market price is less than the book equity.

 

GO
Merge Selected
Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...





Reading This Topic


Login
Existing Account
Email Address:


Password:


Social Logins

  • Login with twitter
  • Login with twitter
Select a Forum....











































































































































































































































Neas-Seminars

Search