Corpfin Mod 6: Geometric Average vs Arithmetic Average


Corpfin Mod 6: Geometric Average vs Arithmetic Average

Author
Message
NEAS
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Posts: 4.3K, Visits: 1.3K


Corporate Finance, Module 6, “Risk, Return, and the Opportunity Cost of Capital”

Geometric Average vs Arithmetic Average

(The attached PDF file has better formatting.)


Illustration: Geometric vs Arithmetic Average

An investment returns either 0% or 20% each year, with a 50% probability of each. What is the expected annual return?

Question: Consider the expected return over two years. The investment may earn 0% the first year and 20% the next year, or 20% the first year and 0% the next year. Either way, the two year return is 20%, which is equivalent to 1.20½ –1 = 9.54% per annum. We use the geometric average, not the arithmetic average.

Answer: You are correct that 20% over two years is equivalent to 9.54% over one year. But the expected return over two years is not 20%. The investment has four possible returns, not two:

    Returns    
Scenario    Year 1    Year 2    Two Year    Probability
1    0%    0%    0%    25%
2    0%    20%    20%    25%
3    20%    0%    20%    25%
4    20%    20%    44%    25%
Total            84%    100%


The expected return is 84% / 4 = 21%. The expected annual return is 1.21½ – 1 = 10%. This is the arithmetic average of 0% and 20%.



Attachments
Edited 6 Years Ago by NEAS
mcgowan04
Junior Member
Junior Member (16 reputation)Junior Member (16 reputation)Junior Member (16 reputation)Junior Member (16 reputation)Junior Member (16 reputation)Junior Member (16 reputation)Junior Member (16 reputation)Junior Member (16 reputation)Junior Member (16 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16, Visits: 1

For the colum titled Two Year, is this just the difference between Year 1 & Year 2?  How did they get 44% for Scenario 4?

Thanks again!


LB81
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (3 reputation)Forum Newbie (3 reputation)Forum Newbie (3 reputation)Forum Newbie (3 reputation)Forum Newbie (3 reputation)Forum Newbie (3 reputation)Forum Newbie (3 reputation)Forum Newbie (3 reputation)Forum Newbie (3 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3, Visits: 1

It's because of compound interest.

 

(1.20)*(1.20) = 1.44

 

So, there's a 44% return for the two years.


mcgowan04
Junior Member
Junior Member (16 reputation)Junior Member (16 reputation)Junior Member (16 reputation)Junior Member (16 reputation)Junior Member (16 reputation)Junior Member (16 reputation)Junior Member (16 reputation)Junior Member (16 reputation)Junior Member (16 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16, Visits: 1

Thanks!  I can't believe I missed that!  lol


NEAS
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Posts: 4.3K, Visits: 1.3K
mcgowan04 - 6/15/2005 9:03:51 AM

Thanks!  I can't believe I missed that!  lol


 

GO
Merge Selected
Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...





Reading This Topic


Login
Existing Account
Email Address:


Password:


Social Logins

  • Login with twitter
  • Login with twitter
Select a Forum....











































































































































































































































Neas-Seminars

Search