Help needed!!! - Where to get the Critical 10% level of the chi square values please?


Help needed!!! - Where to get the Critical 10% level of the chi square...

Author
Message
wdu
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (8 reputation)Forum Newbie (8 reputation)Forum Newbie (8 reputation)Forum Newbie (8 reputation)Forum Newbie (8 reputation)Forum Newbie (8 reputation)Forum Newbie (8 reputation)Forum Newbie (8 reputation)Forum Newbie (8 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1, Visits: 1

I am performing the Box-Pierce Q Statistic  test and wonder Where to get the Critical 10% level of the chi square values please?

[NEAS: Use Excel or R; or Google "chi-square"]



wdu
Scott.McEachern
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5, Visits: 1

What do you use to get the Box Pierce Q statistic?

I have seen in the book that

Q = T*sum(r^2) where r = sum(e(t)*e(t-k))/sum(e(t)^2)

So how do we get e(t-k) when we should use k = 100? Do we start at e(101) and multiply that by the first residual e(1), sum all those up.

I am quite confused on this part and it is the last part of the project that I need to complete to describe my model.

[NEAS: Yes. The numerator has fewer terms than the denominator, which adjusts for degrees of freedom in the correlations.]


Scott.McEachern
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5, Visits: 1
So if you have K=100 and a total of 10 years of data points (T= 3652). Would you use the above mentioned formula to get your Q statistic, and compare this to a chi-squared critical value of 10% and 3652 data points - the number of parameters (1 for AR(1) etc)?

If i am basing my AR models off of one years worth of points (T = 365) should i instead use K as 100 and T as 365 and only calculate the Q statistic based on the residuals from the 365 points?

Thanks for the help
GO
Merge Selected
Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...





Reading This Topic


Login
Existing Account
Email Address:


Password:


Social Logins

  • Login with twitter
  • Login with twitter
Select a Forum....













































































































































































































































Neas-Seminars

Search