TS Module 9: Non-stationary ARIMA time series HW


TS Module 9: Non-stationary ARIMA time series HW

Author
Message
DamonK
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5, Visits: 104
I give up..I too am stuck with all the same problems as the above posts. How do you get to( b^(2t)-1))/(b^2-1)sigma^2 from formula 5.1.3?

-Damon
Edited 12 Years Ago by DamonK
moo5003
Junior Member
Junior Member (11 reputation)Junior Member (11 reputation)Junior Member (11 reputation)Junior Member (11 reputation)Junior Member (11 reputation)Junior Member (11 reputation)Junior Member (11 reputation)Junior Member (11 reputation)Junior Member (11 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10, Visits: 60

I'm confused by the correlation equation.

I derived:

Beta * [ (1-Beta^(2t-2)) / (1-Beta^(2t)) ]^(1/2)

My equation almost matches the book except for the 1/2 power.  It seems like they divided by Var(Y_t) instead of:

Root[ Var(Y_t)*Var(Y_t-1) ]

Can anyone confirm my answer?


ktanner22
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (9 reputation)Forum Newbie (9 reputation)Forum Newbie (9 reputation)Forum Newbie (9 reputation)Forum Newbie (9 reputation)Forum Newbie (9 reputation)Forum Newbie (9 reputation)Forum Newbie (9 reputation)Forum Newbie (9 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10, Visits: 1
I am following your method and have Var(Y_t) = sigma^2( 1 + b^2 + b^4 + b^6 + ... + b^2(t-1) + b^2t x 0) = sigma^2( 1 + b^2 + b^4 + b^6 + ... + b^2(t-1)) = sigma^2( (1/(1-b^2)) - (b^2t + b^2(t+1) + b^2(t+2)+...). This second part of the equation is what we have to subtract out since it is not an infinite series of 1 + b^2 + b^4 + ...

Next I get: = sigma^2( (1/(1-b^2)) - b^2t(1 + b^2 + b^4 + b^6 + ...)) = sigma^2( (1/(1-b^2)) - b^2t(1/(1-b^2))). There is a common denominator of 1- b^2, and in the numerator it's 1 - b^2t. Therefore, we get sigma^2((1-b^2t)/(1-b^2)).

I am so close, and if I multiply by (-1)/(-1) on both sides of the equation, am I good? So many people were saying they had a negative sign problem, but this doesn't cause a problem, does it?

Var(Y_t) * (-1/-1) = sigma^2((1-b^2t)/(1-b^2) * (-1/-1)
Var(Y_t) ) = sigma^2((b^2t-1)/(b^2-1)

Someone please confirm, I have been working on this for way too long.
dystrother
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1, Visits: 1
I'm have the same sign error as previously posted. I get o^2e(1+b^2+b^4+...+b^(2(t-1))+0), then using the geometric formula i get o^2e[(1-b^2t)/(1-b^2)] This times -1 gives you the correct answer...but I can't figure out where the -1 is coming from. I looked at the post that said something like...subtract the rest of the series from the infinite series...1/(1-b^2)...but how do I know what the rest of the series is...isn't that also an infinite series?
JasonScandopolous
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4, Visits: 1

Ah, I see, Y(0) is assumed to be 0, thereby removing B^2t from the original thing I posted, and making that the subtracted term in the finite series.


JasonScandopolous
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4, Visits: 1

I am having trouble getting the exact result for VAR(Y).

In both the text and from first principles, I am arriving easily at Var(Y) = sigma-sq * (1 + B^2 + B^2*2 + B^2*3... + B^2t).  If this were an infinite series, the sum would be [1 / (1 - B^2)].  Don't we want to subtract out the rest of the series, starting at B^2(t+1), thereby making the variance:

 sigma-sq * [B^2(t+1) - 1] / [B^2 - 1]..... rather than the same thing with B^2*t?  I'm sure since at least some of you figured this out that I am just messing something up, but I can't see what I've done wrong.


Ron
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5, Visits: 1
Correlation is

Corr(X,Y) = Cov(X,Y) / (sigma_X * sigma_Y)
= Cov(X,Y) / sqrt( Var(X) * Var(Y) )

Corr(Y_t, Y_t-k) = Cov(Y_t, Y_t-k) / sqrt( Var(Y_t) * Var(Y_t-k) )

In this case, X is Y_t and Y is Y_t-k. For a stationary process, Var(Y_t-k) does not depend on k and the square root drops out. In this case, Var(Y_t-k) depends on k, so the square root does not go away.

RayDHIII
Forum Member
Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 39, Visits: 138

rmconrad, the variance of Y0 is simply the variance of the initial error, e0.  The variance of betatY0 should easily follow from there, recalling the rules of variance and beta a constant.  Let me know if you have further questions.

RDH


rmconrad
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2, Visits: 1

I must be missing a negative sign somewhere in my derivation of the Variance of Equation 5.1.3. I am not sure exactly what to do with the (beta^t)*(Y_0) term at the end when taking the variance, so I'm sure that's where I'm messing up. 

Not taking that term into account, I sum a geometric series to get Var_Yt = (sigma^2)_e * (1 - beta^2t) / (1 - beta^2). Multiplying that by -1 gets me to the variance expressed in Equation 5.1.4, but I don't know how to add the variance of the last term in 5.1.3 to get to the -1 multiplier that I need. Any help/suggestions? Thanks.


zarito
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)Forum Newbie (2 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1, Visits: 1
Believe me, I got the formulas for the general case, by using the beta=3 scenario The problem was the derivation, since I was not sure which time series to use for the general case. Thank you for the help!
GO
Merge Selected
Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...





Reading This Topic


Login
Existing Account
Email Address:


Password:


Social Logins

  • Login with twitter
  • Login with twitter
Select a Forum....











































































































































































































































Neas-Seminars

Search