Use of the Y_t


Use of the Y_t

Author
Message
Doc
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (4 reputation)Forum Newbie (4 reputation)Forum Newbie (4 reputation)Forum Newbie (4 reputation)Forum Newbie (4 reputation)Forum Newbie (4 reputation)Forum Newbie (4 reputation)Forum Newbie (4 reputation)Forum Newbie (4 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3, Visits: 1

I have a question regarding the text's treatment of formula (4.1.1). It defines Y_t as depending on the previous t unobserved white noise terms. Therefore, Y_t is not an infinite series even though the author treats it as an infinite series.

In particular, formulas on page 56 take advantage of the geometric series formula 1/(1-x) = sum_{k=0}^{infinity} x^k. These sums cannot be infinite since the sum is counting down the e_k used from e_t to e_0. Shouldn't the author be using the partial sum formula

(1-r^{t+1})/(1-r) = sum_{k=0}^t r^k?

[NEAS: Module 9 discusses this topic more fully. For non-stationary time series, one needs a starting point; the textbook uses "-m". For stationary time series, we think of the series as infinite. If the time series is not very short, this is a good approximation, and it clarifies the equilibrium in the stationary time series.]


GO
Merge Selected
Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...




Threaded View



Reading This Topic


Login
Existing Account
Email Address:


Password:


Social Logins

  • Login with twitter
  • Login with twitter
Select a Forum....











































































































































































































































Neas-Seminars

Search