Question on part C...
Wouldn't the conventional equation for correlation not work in this scenario since we cannot assume stationarity? Stationarity, by definition, depends only on lag and not absolute time, but we can see that because the terms do not follow the same pattern for every lag of 2, then the correlation assumption doesn't hold.
Given the explanation for Psi on page 55, the coefficient on the first expression isn't non-existent, but is simply Phi^0. This would lead to a coefficient pattern of +, +, -, +, -, +, -, ... , wherein the correlation between e(t) and e(t-2) would be negative, but all other intervals would be positive.
I'm not sure whether I'm missing something, or if the equation is given later in the book, or if the answer is undefined. Any help is appreciated.