RA sproj violent crime


RA sproj violent crime

Author
Message
NEAS
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (6K reputation)Supreme Being (6K reputation)Supreme Being (6K reputation)Supreme Being (6K reputation)Supreme Being (6K reputation)Supreme Being (6K reputation)Supreme Being (6K reputation)Supreme Being (6K reputation)Supreme Being (6K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Posts: 4.3K, Visits: 1.5K

The candidate writes: "We choose this model because it produces the optimal solution – a maximized R2 and a minimized count of variables.  Under the four-variable model, only 29.46% of the variance in violent crime rate can be explained by the X’s.  Therefore, although the four-variable model is the most parsimonious of those that we have observed, it may not be used to accurately explain violent crime rates." Actually, 29.46% is quite good for a regression explaining crime rates. The analysis is done properly, and one would not expect a much higher correlation.


Attachments
RA sproj violent crime.doc (2.8K views, 117.00 KB)
GO
Merge Selected
Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...




Threaded View

Threaded View
NEAS - 13 Years Ago


Reading This Topic


Login
Existing Account
Email Address:


Password:


Social Logins

  • Login with twitter
  • Login with twitter
Select a Forum....












































































































































































































































Neas-Seminars

Search