Fox Module 15: Advanced interactions Homework


Fox Module 15: Advanced interactions Homework

Author
Message
NEAS
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Posts: 4.5K, Visits: 1.6K


Fox Module 15: Advanced interactions

(The attached PDF file has better formatting.)



Homework assignment: F test with interactions



Tables 7.1 and 7.2 on page 139 are tested on the final exam. This homework assignment explains the computations for the F test in these tables.

The variables mean: I = income, E = education, and T = type

The regression sums of squares are



Model

Terms

Sum of Squares

df

1

I, E, T, I × T, E × T

24,794

8

2

I, E, T, I × T

24,556

6

3

I, E, T, E × T

23,842

6

4

I, E, T

23,666

4

5

I, E

23,074

2

6

I, T, I × T

23,488

5

7

E, T, E × T

22,710

5



Table 7.2 shows the degrees of freedom and sum of squares in the numerator of the F test.



Source

Models Contrasted

Sum of Squares

df

F

Income

3 – 7

1,132

1

28.35

Education

2 – 6

1,068

1

26.75

Type

4 – 5

592

2

7.41

Income × Type

1 – 3

952

2

11.92

Education × Type

1 – 2

238

2

2.98

Residuals

3,553

89

Total

28,347

97



For each model,

The residual sum of squares is

.

The regression sum of squares is .

The total sum of squares is .

Why does the total sum of squares (TSS) not depend on the model? What is the TSS in this illustration?

Which model has the smallest residual sum of squares (RSS)? How do we know this even without computing any figures?

How do we test the significance of income? What is the null hypothesis? How the F-ratio is computed? (Show the calculations.)

How do we test the significance of education × type? What is the null hypothesis? How the F-ratio is computed? (Show the calculations.)

The following comments may help you understand the exhibits:

The degrees of freedom in Table 7.1 on page 139 are the number of explanatory variables in the model (k). The degrees of freedom are actually N-k-1. But this illustration focuses on the degrees of freedom for the numerator of the F test, which is the difference in the number of variables in the full vs reduced models. N-1 is the same for all models, so it drops out of the difference.

For the number of explanatory variables:

I and E are one explanatory variable each.

T, I × T, and E × T are two explanatory variables each.

The total sum of squares is 28,347. The sample has 98 data points, so the total sum of squares has 98 – 1 = 97 degrees of freedom. The full model (Model 1) has a regression sum of squares of 24,794, so it has a residual sum of squares of 28,347 – 24,794 = 3,553. This residual sum of squares has 98 – 8 – 1 = 89 degrees of freedom.

Show the calculation of the F-ratio for Parts C and D.


Attachments
nick.a.geiger
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1, Visits: 31
For the denominator of the F-test, are we always supposed to use the RSS from the full model (model 1). 

In testing income, would the denominator be the RSS from model 3, 4505, with 98-4-1=93 degrees of freedom for an F-stat of 23.3687?

Or, if we always use the RSS and degrees of freedom from model 1, why? How does this fit within our definition of the incremental F test?
GO
Merge Selected
Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...





Reading This Topic


Login
Existing Account
Email Address:


Password:


Social Logins

  • Login with twitter
  • Login with twitter
Select a Forum....













































































































































































































































Neas-Seminars

Search