Micro Mod 12: Homework


Micro Mod 12: Homework

Author
Message
NEAS
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Posts: 4.3K, Visits: 1.3K

Demand Curve

Jacob: Sometimes the demand curve is written as Q in terms of P and sometimes it is written as P in terms of Q. Which way should we use?

Rachel: We can write supply and demand curves as P in terms of Q or Q in terms of P.

~ For the intersection of the two curves, we can use either form. We solve a pair of linear equations. Both forms make sense. We ask: "For a given price, how many units do consumers demand?" or "For a given quantity, what is the maximum that consumers will pay?"

~ To add demand curves of two groups of consumers, we write Q in terms of P. We ask: "For a given price, what is the total demand?" We are not asking: "For a given quantity, what is the total price?" That last question doesn’t make sense.

~ For a sales tax or excise tax, we write Q in terms of P.

~ For elasticities, we generally write Q in terms of P. We don’t have to use this form, but it makes the computation easier. We find MQ/MP, which is easier to derive if we write Q in terms of P.

~ For the marginal revenue curve, we write P in terms of Q. We solve for the additional revenue from one more unit sold, not for an additional dollar of price.


NEAS
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Posts: 4.3K, Visits: 1.3K

Comparing Elasticities

Jacob: Can you show how we compare elasticities at a given price?

Rachel: We write the demand curve as Q in terms of P:

Adults: QA = 150 – 6PA

Seniors: QS = 120 – 8PS

 

At P = 10, the elasticities are

 

Adults: –6 × 10 / 90 = –0.667

Seniors: –8 × 10 / 40 = –2.000

 

We chose P = 10 arbitrarily. For the homework assignment, you observe that this is true at all prices, or you observe that this is true at the equilibrium price and quantity.

Actual Elasticities

Jacob: Is this what we expect in real life?

Rachel: That depends on the scenario. Some seniors are not working, so they have less current income and more free time. They are more likely to choose a lower cost product. Their higher price elasticity of demand leads to senior discounts for many products.

For some products, seniors have a lower price elasticity of demand. An older person may have less information about competing prices or may be disabled and is not able to price shop. The senior will remain with a given supplier even if a less expensive product is offered by another supplier.

Jacob: One candidate writes on the discussion forum that for P=21, the elasticity for adults is -5.25 and 3.5 for seniors, and for P = 19, the elasticity for adults is -3.167 and 4.75 for seniors. Is this correct?

Rachel: The price elasticity of demand is never positive. At P = 19 or P = 21, seniors don’t buy any of the good. At P = 15, the quantity demanded is zero. At P > 15, the quantity demanded remains zero.

Jacob: Is the price elasticity of demand zero for P > 15?

Rachel: The price elasticity of demand is not defined at P > 15.

Elasticities of Linear Demand Curves

Jacob: If the demand curve is linear, how we easily see which curve is more elastic?

Rachel: See the Concepts and Overview posting: if Q = αβP, the market with greater price elasticity of demand has a smaller α/β.


NEAS
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Posts: 4.3K, Visits: 1.3K

Total Market Demand Curves

Jacob: What is the total market demand curve?

Rachel: We add the two demand curves:

Qtotal = QT = QA + QS = 150 – 6P + 120 – 8P = 270 – 14P

To add two demand curves, we must have Q in terms of P, not P in terms of Q.

Jacob: Do we write QT in terms of PA + PS or in terms of a single P?

Rachel: We write QT in terms of a single P. We ask: "What is the total quantity demanded in the market if we do not discriminate by group?" We are not asking: "What is the total quantity demanded by both groups if they each have their own price."


NEAS
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Posts: 4.3K, Visits: 1.3K

Equilibrium Price and Quantity

Jacob: How do we solve for the equilibrium price and quantity?

Rachel: We set marginal cost = marginal revenue. We write the demand curve as P in terms of Q. Both marginal cost and marginal revenue are in terms of Q, not in terms of P. They are the additional cost or revenue for one more unit, not for one more dollar of price.

Jacob: Is there a way to write marginal cost and marginal revenue in terms of P?

Rachel: Marginal cost has nothing to do with price, so we can’t write it in terms of P. For the demand curve, Q is a function of P, so we could write marginal revenue in terms of P. But marginal cost is function of Q, so we must have marginal revenue as a function of Q.

Marginal Cost by Group

Jacob: How do we get the marginal cost curve for adults vs seniors?

Rachel: The marginal cost curve depends on the total quantity produced. The cost of a plane ticket, a train ticket, a theater seat, or a magazine is the same regardless who sits in the seat or reads the magazine.

Marginal Revenue

Jacob: How do we get the marginal revenue curve?

Rachel: We use the demand curve for that market, which differs for seniors, adults, or the total. We write P in terms of Q. We then multiply P × Q, to get their product in terms of Q (not in terms of P).

The product of total revenue. The partial derivative of total revenue with respect to quantity is marginal revenue.

Jacob: Is there a simple formula for a linear demand curve?

Rachel: If the demand curve is P = αβ Q, the marginal revenue curve is MR = α – 2 β P.

Solving the Homework Assignment

Jacob: How do we solve the homework assignment for two separate groups?

Rachel: We write three equations in three unknowns. The equations are simple linear equations, so the arithmetic is easy.

The three unknowns are QA, QS, and Qtotal. One linear equation is QA + QS = Qtotal.

~ For adults, we write the marginal revenue as a function of QA and the marginal cost as a function of Qtotal.

~ For seniors, we write the marginal revenue as a function of QS and the marginal cost as a function of Qtotal.


NEAS
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Posts: 4.3K, Visits: 1.3K

Insurance

Jacob: For insurance we also set different prices by group, such as men vs women or old vs young. Do the same principles apply?

Rachel: Insurance is not price discrimination. Men and women have different costs, and we price each group separately.

Jacob: We have many pricing actuaries at my company, and no one estimates marginal revenue or marginal cost. Is Landsburg’s text realistic?

Rachel: Actuaries set rates for the next policy year in highly competitive markets. This is long-term competitive pricing. We set premium rates at the minimum total cost, including both variable and fixed costs.

Almost all insurance expenses are variables costs. They may vary with policy counts or exposures, not necessarily with premium, but they are still variable costs. This makes long-term pricing easy.

Short term pricing is done by underwriters, not by actuaries. (For reinsurance pricing, actuaries often work with the underwriters.) The underwriter must consider elasticities, sunk costs, and the other items that Landsburg discusses.

Good underwriters do this, but without the equations. Landsburg does not say that firms use these equations to price their products. Firms price this way by common sense, trial and error, and experience. If they price too high, they don’t sell the product. If they price too how, they lose money.


liz
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1, Visits: 1

I am stuck on question I:

If MC = .05q, and we determine QA by setting MC and MRA equal, I get the following:

MC  =  MRA

.05 = 25 - QA/3

q = 74.85

I am checking my results against Rick Sutherland's posting from 11/20/2006, and I see that I am not correct.  Could someone please identify for me where I went wrong.

Thanks.

[NEAS: MC depends on total Q for all consumeres; MR depends on the quantity for each market segment. Solve by simultaneous linear equations.]


NEAS
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)Supreme Being (5.9K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Posts: 4.3K, Visits: 1.3K
liz - 12/15/2009 1:19:35 PM

I am stuck on question I:

If MC = .05q, and we determine QA by setting MC and MRA equal, I get the following:

MC  =  MRA

.05 = 25 - QA/3

q = 74.85

I am checking my results against Rick Sutherland's posting from 11/20/2006, and I see that I am not correct.  Could someone please identify for me where I went wrong.

Thanks.

[NEAS: MC depends on total Q for all consumeres; MR depends on the quantity for each market segment. Solve by simultaneous linear equations.]


 

GO
Merge Selected
Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...





Reading This Topic


Login
Existing Account
Email Address:


Password:


Social Logins

  • Login with twitter
  • Login with twitter
Select a Forum....











































































































































































































































Neas-Seminars

Search