TS Module 16: ARIMA Forecasting HW


TS Module 16: ARIMA Forecasting HW

Author
Message
moo5003
Junior Member
Junior Member (10 reputation)Junior Member (10 reputation)Junior Member (10 reputation)Junior Member (10 reputation)Junior Member (10 reputation)Junior Member (10 reputation)Junior Member (10 reputation)Junior Member (10 reputation)Junior Member (10 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10, Visits: 60

I also got:

Mean = 2
Theta = 1.5
Forecast Y_50(1) = 74.1

For whatever reason I forgot how to get the residual... finally just wrote down all the equations and realized its just (Actual - Forecast). 


minnie53053
Junior Member
Junior Member (13 reputation)Junior Member (13 reputation)Junior Member (13 reputation)Junior Member (13 reputation)Junior Member (13 reputation)Junior Member (13 reputation)Junior Member (13 reputation)Junior Member (13 reputation)Junior Member (13 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11, Visits: 1
I got what you got too, but I am still a little unsure about that.
An ARMA model:
W(t)=mu+e(t)-theta*e(t-1), is right?
I am not sure if we use W(t)=y(t)-y(t-1), or W(t)=y-hat(t)-y-hat(t-1).
Here, I used W(t)=y(t)-y(t-1) to solve mu and theta.

but, in the moduel 18, this problem appears again, I am a little confused.
Gribble
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (3 reputation)Forum Newbie (3 reputation)Forum Newbie (3 reputation)Forum Newbie (3 reputation)Forum Newbie (3 reputation)Forum Newbie (3 reputation)Forum Newbie (3 reputation)Forum Newbie (3 reputation)Forum Newbie (3 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2, Visits: 1
That's what I got.
KenShun
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (9 reputation)Forum Newbie (9 reputation)Forum Newbie (9 reputation)Forum Newbie (9 reputation)Forum Newbie (9 reputation)Forum Newbie (9 reputation)Forum Newbie (9 reputation)Forum Newbie (9 reputation)Forum Newbie (9 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8, Visits: 1

This is very important module, I am getting mean = 2, theta = 1.5, ARIMA forecast for period 51 = 74.1.

Did anyone get the same thing?


RayDHIII
Forum Member
Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 39, Visits: 138

We are given the equation (9.3.21) since ARIMA(0,1,1)'s first difference is MA(1):

deltaY-hatt(1) = mu - theta(et)

We know two of the ARMA forecasts and two of the residuals for t = 48 and 49.  This will produce two equations with two unknowns, simple algebra to solve.

RDH


cmo
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1, Visits: 1

I guess I don't understand what I'm doing here.  I can't seem to see how the residuals, forecasts, and actual values that I derived fit into either equation 9.3.30 or 9.3.32.  I guess I'm confused because we're supposed to find mu and theta_1, but neither of these equations contains both variables.  And how do we solve this without know phi?

Can somebody steer me right?


RayDHIII
Forum Member
Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 39, Visits: 138

I'm getting dizzy reading the last post.  =P

The forecast for the ARMA(0,1) of period 49 uses the forecast of the ARIMA(0,1,1) period 49 (which is calculated from period 48) less the actual ARIMA of period 48.  So, indeed, your deltaY-hat48(1) = 72 - 71.5 = 0.5.

"Don't mix periods" means what it sounds like:  If you're attempting to find forecasts for one period ahead, say, t=2, then only use values derived from the preceeding time period, t=1.  Let me know if you have further questions.

RDH


Matt Feipel
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (8 reputation)Forum Newbie (8 reputation)Forum Newbie (8 reputation)Forum Newbie (8 reputation)Forum Newbie (8 reputation)Forum Newbie (8 reputation)Forum Newbie (8 reputation)Forum Newbie (8 reputation)Forum Newbie (8 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7, Visits: 1

Question for NEAS:  Since the homework specifies that these are "one period ahead" forecasts, does this mean that for calculating the forecasts for the MA(1) process we are suppose to take the forecast in period t minus the actual in period t-1?  For example, deltaY(49)-hat = 72 - 71.5 = .5, or is it 72 - 70.5 = 1.5?

[NEAS: Don't mix periods. One period ahead forecast means we forecast Period T from the values in Period T-1. The residual uses the forecast and the actual values for the same period.]

I don't understand what you mean by "don't mix periods."  You say "One period ahead forecast means we forecast Period T from the values in Period T-1" - All I was asking is if the value in Period T-1 is the actual or forcasted value for that period.

I was asking about the first difference forecasts.  According to the "TS Module 16: ARIMA forecasting: values residuals forecasts" handout on the last line of the first page in the pdf file, we would calculate deltaY(49)-hat = 72 - 71.5 = .5. Right?


RayDHIII
Forum Member
Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)Forum Member (43 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 39, Visits: 138

To my knowledge, you're equations are completely wrong.  I went about this problem by setting up a table:

Period            ARIMA(0,1,1)                  ARMA(0,1)

           Forcast  Actual    Residual     Forcast       Actual

48     Y-hat47(1)   Y48        e48           --              --

49     Y-hat48(1)   Y49        e49   deltaY-hat48(1)  deltaY49

50     Y-hat49(1)   Y50        e50   deltaY-hat49(1)  deltaY50

51     Y-hat50(1)    --         --    deltaY-hat50(1)    --

 

Note that the residuals are shared between the two processes.  The assignement is fairly straighforward from there.  Let me know if you have any further questions.

RDH


ehezel
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (4 reputation)Forum Newbie (4 reputation)Forum Newbie (4 reputation)Forum Newbie (4 reputation)Forum Newbie (4 reputation)Forum Newbie (4 reputation)Forum Newbie (4 reputation)Forum Newbie (4 reputation)Forum Newbie (4 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4, Visits: 1

When working out the 2 equations I am getting the mean equal to -.2 and Theta equal to .3 .  Am I even close or my equations completely wrong?  Thanks


GO
Merge Selected
Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...





Reading This Topic


Login
Existing Account
Email Address:


Password:


Social Logins

  • Login with twitter
  • Login with twitter
Select a Forum....











































































































































































































































Neas-Seminars

Search